PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP.DE achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than CBUT.DE's 26.50% return.


KROP.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
17.14%
6M
13.93%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUT.DE

1D
-3.41%
1M
2.84%
YTD
26.50%
6M
13.62%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
44.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KROP.DE
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
17.14%-4.87%-2.79%-25.11%-9.52%
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.50%13.17%12.43%235.40%-36.41%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP.DE and CBUT.DE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.27

The correlation between KROP.DE and CBUT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP.DE
KROP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KROP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUT.DE
CBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KROP.DECBUT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.46

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

2.77

-0.56

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP.DE and CBUT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KROP.DECBUT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.22

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

0.67

-1.14

Drawdowns

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUT.DE drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.DE and CBUT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KROP.DECBUT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-53.95%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-43.09%

+33.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-53.95%

+26.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.08%

-14.86%

-26.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-19.96%

-16.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

22.75%

-18.41%

Volatility

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) is 5.58%, while iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a volatility of 14.16%. This indicates that KROP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KROP.DECBUT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

14.16%

-8.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

36.13%

-24.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

51.55%

-36.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

60.46%

-40.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

60.46%

-40.82%

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KROP.DE and CBUT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

KROP.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither KROP.DE nor CBUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KROP.DE and CBUT.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KROP.DE and CBUT.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation, while CBUT.DE tracks NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KROP.DE and CBUT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer