KRE vs. HSBH
KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) and HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index while HSBH tracks the HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KRE returned 30.35% vs 70.78% for HSBH. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for HSBH.
Performance
KRE vs. HSBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than HSBH's 26.20% return.
KRE
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
HSBH
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 26.20%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 70.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRE vs. HSBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 12.38% | 26.16% |
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 26.20% | 39.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRE and HSBH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.38 |
KRE vs. HSBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRE
HSBH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KRE
HSBH
Basic Materials
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Communication Services
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Consumer Cyclical
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Consumer Defensive
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Energy
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Healthcare
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Industrials
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Real Estate
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Technology
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Utilities
KRE
-
HSBH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRE vs. HSBH — Risk / Return Rank
KRE
HSBH
KRE vs. HSBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRE | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 4.62 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 16.73 | -11.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRE vs. HSBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than HSBH's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and HSBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRE | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -14.81% | -53.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -14.81% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -2.35% | -19.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 4.08% | +1.67% |
Volatility
KRE vs. HSBH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) is 6.20%, while HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that KRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRE | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 8.70% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 19.35% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 23.71% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 22.94% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 22.94% | +8.99% |
KRE vs. HSBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HSBH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRE vs. HSBH - Dividend Comparison
KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than HSBH's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.76% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRE and HSBH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSBH has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to KRE (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs HSBH's -14.81%.
On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 70.78% vs 30.35% for KRE. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KRE has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 70.78% return vs 30.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KRE.
KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.35% for HSBH.
KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while HSBH tracks HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 0.19% for HSBH.
HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRE and HSBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer