PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 7.71%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%

XOM

1D
1.22%
1M
5.68%
YTD
27.80%
6M
32.61%
1Y
50.17%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
27.80%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and XOM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 1978

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

XOM:

$5.93

PE Ratio

KR:

52.67

XOM:

25.60

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.64

XOM:

1.19

PS Ratio

KR:

0.28

XOM:

1.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

XOM:

$326.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

XOM:

$83.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

XOM:

$60.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.34

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.21

-3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

8.97

-9.25

KR vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRXOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

2.07

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.90

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.48

-0.12

Drawdowns

KR vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-62.40%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-15.69%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-18.92%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-20.51%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-61.34%

+15.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-10.90%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-10.20%

-12.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

5.61%

+4.35%

Volatility

KR vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) have volatilities of 9.14% and 9.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

9.20%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

20.29%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

24.44%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

26.73%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.95%

28.19%

+0.76%

Dividends

KR vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than XOM's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.69%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

KR vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
83.16B
(KR) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.0%
37.7%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and XOM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to KR (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer