PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. SHEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Shell plc (SHEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than SHEL's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed SHEL with an annualized return of 7.71%, while SHEL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%

SHEL

1D
1.46%
1M
4.13%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.39%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
23.01%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
SHEL
Shell plc
20.10%22.16%-0.87%20.19%36.18%34.27%-41.08%6.38%-7.23%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and SHEL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2005

0.17

The correlation between KR and SHEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

SHEL:

$6.39

PE Ratio

KR:

52.67

SHEL:

13.55

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.64

SHEL:

0.68

PS Ratio

KR:

0.28

SHEL:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

SHEL:

$266.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

SHEL:

$41.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

SHEL:

$57.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRSHELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.26

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.00

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

8.40

-8.69

KR vs. SHEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the SHEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and SHEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRSHELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

1.54

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.92

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.22

+0.14

Drawdowns

KR vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum SHEL drawdown of -71.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and SHEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRSHELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-71.57%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-10.81%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-18.47%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-25.04%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-71.57%

+25.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-7.13%

-9.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-16.74%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

3.85%

+6.11%

Volatility

KR vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Shell plc (SHEL) at 5.98%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRSHELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

5.98%

+3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

17.50%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

21.15%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

25.22%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.95%

30.84%

-1.89%

Dividends

KR vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than SHEL's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%

Financials

KR vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
69.57B
(KR) Total Revenue
(SHEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. SHEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and Shell plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.0%
19.1%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

SHEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

SHEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

SHEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and SHEL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to SHEL (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs SHEL's -71.57%.

SHEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and SHEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer