PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 14.41% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 7.14%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.86% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.09%
6M
-6.69%
YTD
-5.63%
1Y
-16.55%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
7.14%
ALL TIME*
11.14%

RIO

1D
-1.20%
1M
-11.00%
6M
7.55%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
18.86%
ALL TIME*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
-5.63%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
14.41%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and RIO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990

0.13

The correlation between KR and RIO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KR:

$35.75B

RIO:

$144.65B

EPS

KR:

$1.64

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

KR:

35.55

RIO:

6.79

PS Ratio

KR:

0.25

RIO:

1.31

PB Ratio

KR:

5.54

RIO:

2.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$148.65B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$34.46B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.60B

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.31

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.66

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

8.59

-9.95

KR vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KR vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-88.97%

+22.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.16%

-20.74%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.16%

-24.19%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-35.25%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.13%

-37.47%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.40%

-20.50%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-23.74%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

6.41%

+5.77%

Volatility

KR vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 8.38%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.65%

8.38%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.82%

24.96%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

29.72%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.23%

29.33%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.16%

30.42%

-1.26%

Dividends

KR vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than RIO's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.40%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
4.51%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

KR vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B20222023202420252026
46.12B
30.65B
(KR) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
23.0%
26.6%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 10.63B and revenue of 46.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of 903.00M and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and RIO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to RIO (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer