PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. BHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and BHP Group (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 41.38% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 7.71%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%

BHP

1D
1.18%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
41.38%
6M
46.29%
1Y
75.94%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
BHP
BHP Group
41.38%28.91%-24.64%16.50%44.34%0.91%25.37%24.50%10.55%33.87%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and BHP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1987

0.15

The correlation between KR and BHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

BHP:

$8.51

PE Ratio

KR:

52.67

BHP:

9.84

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.64

BHP:

2.72

PS Ratio

KR:

0.28

BHP:

1.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

BHP:

$107.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

BHP:

$89.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

BHP:

$52.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRBHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.37

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.86

-4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

14.16

-14.44

KR vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and BHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRBHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

2.41

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.68

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.32

+0.03

Drawdowns

KR vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and BHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRBHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-76.22%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-19.80%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-37.21%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-37.21%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-44.29%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-10.14%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-21.29%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

5.38%

+4.58%

Volatility

KR vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Kroger Co. (KR) is 9.14%, while BHP Group (BHP) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that KR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRBHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

12.75%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

25.95%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

31.73%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

32.31%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.95%

32.31%

-3.36%

Dividends

KR vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than BHP's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHP
BHP Group
3.18%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%

Financials

KR vs. BHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
33.86B
27.95B
(KR) Total Revenue
(BHP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and BHP Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
21.0%
42.9%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and BHP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to KR (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs BHP's -76.22%.

BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and BHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer