KOLD vs. DZZ
KOLD (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas) and DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both Leveraged Commodities funds - KOLD tracks the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex (TR) (200%) while DZZ tracks the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KOLD returned -26.46%/yr vs -10.52%/yr for DZZ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. KOLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DZZ.
Performance
KOLD vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOLD achieves a -37.03% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -48.31% return. Over the past 10 years, KOLD has underperformed DZZ with an annualized return of -26.46%, while DZZ has yielded a comparatively higher -10.52% annualized return.
KOLD
- 1D
- -4.10%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- YTD
- -37.03%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -1.55%
- 3Y*
- -20.65%
- 5Y*
- -40.59%
- 10Y*
- -26.46%
DZZ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -16.65%
- YTD
- -48.31%
- 6M
- -41.62%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- -6.90%
- 5Y*
- -4.82%
- 10Y*
- -10.52%
KOLD vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas | -37.03% | -17.48% | -11.34% | 249.82% | -88.62% | -74.44% | 22.05% | 82.94% | -46.48% | 72.02% |
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -48.31% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.56% | -37.13% | -26.64% | 8.21% | -21.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOLD and DZZ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOLD vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank
KOLD
DZZ
KOLD vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KOLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.14 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 0.21 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KOLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.06 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.26 | -0.16 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | -0.23 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
KOLD vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOLD drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOLD and DZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -96.64% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.50% | -80.84% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.34% | -80.84% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.45% | -80.84% | -17.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.45% | -80.84% | -18.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.43% | -95.16% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.49% | -82.30% | +12.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.01% | 53.19% | -17.18% |
Volatility
KOLD vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) is 24.65%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 30.21%. This indicates that KOLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOLD | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.65% | 30.21% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.37% | 59.65% | +39.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.51% | 169.45% | -55.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.76% | 83.63% | +35.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.76% | 64.05% | +37.71% |
KOLD vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOLD vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither KOLD nor DZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KOLD and DZZ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DZZ has higher volatility (30.21%) compared to KOLD (24.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOLD dropped -99.45% vs DZZ's -96.64%.
On 10-year performance, DZZ leads with -10.52% vs -26.46% for KOLD. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KOLD has been the lower-risk option at 24.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DZZ has performed better with a -10.52% return vs -26.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KOLD.
KOLD and DZZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KOLD tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex (TR) (200%), while DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KOLD and 0.75% for DZZ.
DZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOLD and DZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer