PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOLD vs. ^XNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOLD achieves a -21.43% return, which is significantly lower than ^XNG's 19.46% return. Over the past 10 years, KOLD has underperformed ^XNG with an annualized return of -23.09%, while ^XNG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.


KOLD

1D
2.74%
1M
24.48%
6M
-39.97%
YTD
-21.43%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
-5.58%
5Y*
-33.30%
10Y*
-23.09%

^XNG

1D
1.07%
1M
2.93%
6M
18.94%
YTD
19.46%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KOLD
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas
-21.43%-17.48%-11.34%249.82%-88.62%-74.44%22.05%82.94%-46.48%72.02%
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
19.46%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between KOLD and ^XNG is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOLD vs. ^XNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOLD
KOLD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KOLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
KOLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOLD^XNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

1.95

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

4.86

-4.41

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the ^XNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOLD and ^XNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOLD drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, which is greater than ^XNG's maximum drawdown of -84.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOLD and ^XNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOLD^XNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.45%

-84.52%

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.50%

-11.79%

-60.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.34%

-14.10%

-70.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.75%

-25.27%

-72.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.45%

-77.64%

-21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.79%

-12.79%

-84.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.69%

-27.24%

-42.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.95%

4.73%

+35.22%

Volatility

KOLD vs. ^XNG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) has a higher volatility of 18.94% compared to NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) at 5.07%. This indicates that KOLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOLD^XNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.94%

5.07%

+13.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.36%

12.83%

+78.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.66%

16.21%

+95.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.90%

21.65%

+97.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.71%

28.70%

+73.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOLD and ^XNG have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOLD has higher volatility (18.94%) compared to ^XNG (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOLD dropped -99.45% vs ^XNG's -84.52%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOLD and ^XNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer