PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOID vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOID vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KOID having a 21.24% return and DRIV slightly lower at 20.78%.


KOID

1D
1.13%
1M
-5.39%
6M
14.63%
YTD
21.24%
1Y
46.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRIV

1D
0.82%
1M
-10.13%
6M
10.15%
YTD
20.78%
1Y
47.33%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOID vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KOID and DRIV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.83

The correlation between KOID and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOID vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOID
DRIV

Technology

44.5%
37.3%

Industrials

30.8%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
25.3%

Basic Materials

5.8%
13.7%

Communication Services

-

5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

KOID
44.5%
DRIV
37.3%

Industrials

KOID
30.8%
DRIV
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KOID
18.4%
DRIV
25.3%

Basic Materials

KOID
5.8%
DRIV
13.7%

Communication Services

KOID

-

DRIV
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Energy

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Financial Services

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Healthcare

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Real Estate

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Utilities

KOID

-

DRIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOID vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOID
KOID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOID vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOIDDRIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.85

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

9.09

-0.95

KOID vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOID Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOID and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOID vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOIDDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-41.93%

+23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-16.67%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-15.99%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-15.06%

+11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

5.22%

+0.57%

Volatility

KOID vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) at 10.76%. This indicates that KOID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOIDDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

10.76%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.04%

23.70%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

28.42%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

27.77%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.95%

27.69%

-0.74%

KOID vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOID vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than DRIV's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.61%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%
KOID
KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF
0.70%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOID and DRIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOID has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to DRIV (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOID dropped -18.19% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 47.33% vs 46.98% for KOID. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DRIV has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 47.33% return vs 46.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KOID.

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.61% for DRIV.

KOID is categorized as Technology Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KOID and 0.68% for DRIV.

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOID and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer