KOID vs. CHPS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).

KOID and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KOID is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2025. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both KOID and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KOID vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KOID vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	-2.03%	26.94%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	12.20%	52.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOID achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 12.20% return.

KOID

• 1D: 4.00%
• 1M: -13.93%
• YTD: -2.03%
• 6M: -1.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 5.84%
• 1M: -8.97%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 33.13%
• 1Y: 95.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOID vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOID has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

KOID

KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF

CHPS

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

Return for Risk

KOID vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOID vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOID	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.98	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between KOID and CHPS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KOID vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than CHPS's 0.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.86%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.60%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%

Drawdowns

KOID vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOID drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOID and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOID	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-39.44%	+21.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.92%	-12.68%	-2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-9.63%	+6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KOID	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.40%	37.67%	-14.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.40%	32.80%	-9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.40%	32.80%	-9.40%