KOCT vs. JANB
KOCT (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KOCT is passively managed, while JANB is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
KOCT vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOCT achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.08% return.
KOCT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOCT vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 8.72% | 0.82% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOCT and JANB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOCT vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
KOCT
JANB
KOCT vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KOCT | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KOCT | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.97 | -1.52 |
Drawdowns
KOCT vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOCT drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOCT and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOCT | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -6.52% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.22% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -1.14% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility
KOCT vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOCT | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 7.41% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 7.41% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 7.41% | +7.19% |
KOCT vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOCT vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither KOCT nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOCT and JANB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KOCT.
KOCT and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOCT and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for KOCT and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer