KOCT vs. FFTY
KOCT (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000 Price Return Index, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOCT returned 6.87%/yr vs -2.78%/yr for FFTY. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
KOCT vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOCT achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's 6.26% return.
KOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.51%
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $863.41K | $1.19M | $1.59M | |
| $1.75M | $948.54K | $494.45K |
KOCT vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 11.23% | 10.14% | 11.08% | 9.02% | -7.87% | 5.67% | 2.57% | 3.85% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 6.26% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | 7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOCT and FFTY is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between KOCT and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
KOCT vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KOCT
FFTY
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
KOCT
FFTY
Financial Services
KOCT
FFTY
Technology
KOCT
FFTY
Industrials
KOCT
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
KOCT
FFTY
Real Estate
KOCT
FFTY
Energy
KOCT
FFTY
Basic Materials
KOCT
FFTY
Utilities
KOCT
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
KOCT
FFTY
Communication Services
KOCT
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOCT vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
KOCT
FFTY
KOCT vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOCT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.07 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 0.41 | +4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | 1.00 | +15.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOCT vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOCT drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOCT and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOCT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -59.46% | +31.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -23.29% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -29.60% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.63% | -59.46% | +42.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -25.10% | +24.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -22.32% | +18.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 9.51% | -8.19% |
Volatility
KOCT vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) is 1.35%, while CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that KOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOCT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 8.45% | -7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 29.16% | -22.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 36.53% | -26.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 29.75% | -17.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 27.79% | -13.33% |
KOCT vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOCT vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
KOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.27% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
KOCT Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOCT and FFTY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to KOCT (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOCT dropped -28.22% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 5-year performance, KOCT leads with 6.87% vs -2.78% for FFTY. On fees, KOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KOCT has performed better with a 6.87% return vs -2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for KOCT.
KOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. KOCT tracks Russell 2000 Price Return Index, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KOCT and 0.80% for FFTY.
KOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOCT and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer