KO vs. ABM
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and ABM (ABM Industries Incorporated) are both stocks. KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while ABM operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KO returned 10.64%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for ABM. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KO vs. ABM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than ABM's 15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, KO has outperformed ABM with an annualized return of 10.64%, while ABM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.75% annualized return.
KO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
ABM
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.49M | $19.71M | $24.71M | |
| $1.49B | $1.47B | $1.44B |
KO vs. ABM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 26.97% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 15.62% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between KO and ABM is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.21 |
The correlation between KO and ABM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KO:
$376.85B
ABM:
$2.81B
KO:
$3.32
ABM:
$2.62
KO:
26.39
ABM:
18.32
KO:
3.18
ABM:
0.56
KO:
7.54
ABM:
0.32
KO:
10.45
ABM:
1.62
KO:
$50.13B
ABM:
$9.05B
KO:
$31.02B
ABM:
$1.04B
KO:
$19.57B
ABM:
$398.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KO vs. ABM — Risk / Return Rank
KO
ABM
KO vs. ABM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KO | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.07 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 0.28 | +3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 0.54 | +8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KO vs. ABM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than ABM's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and ABM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KO | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -59.64% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -23.78% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -34.37% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -34.37% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.99% | -52.00% | +15.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -14.72% | +13.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -14.83% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 12.31% | -8.71% |
Volatility
KO vs. ABM - Volatility Comparison
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) at 7.05%. This indicates that KO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KO | ABM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 7.05% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 19.93% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 27.90% | -9.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 31.00% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 33.90% | -15.48% |
Dividends
KO vs. ABM - Dividend Comparison
KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, which matches ABM's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.37% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.37% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
KO vs. ABM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Coca-Cola Company and ABM Industries Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KO vs. ABM - Profitability Comparison
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
ABM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a gross profit of 277.00M and revenue of 2.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.1%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
ABM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported an operating income of 86.90M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
ABM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a net income of 43.10M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KO and ABM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KO has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to ABM (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs ABM's -59.64%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KO and ABM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer