PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KNT.TO (K92 Mining Inc.) is a stock, while XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) is Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 5 years, KNT.TO returned 23.72%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 12.29% return.

KNT.TO

1D
-3.93%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
3.48%
6M
15.84%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
58.03%
5Y*
23.72%
10Y*
34.30%

XEQT.TO

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.98%
YTD
12.29%
6M
11.20%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.		3.48%161.41%33.33%-15.12%6.68%-5.52%164.24%16.60%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		12.29%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KNT.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.20

Over the past year, KNT.TO and XEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

K92 Mining Inc.

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with KNT.TO:
KNT.TO vs. ASAKNT.TO vs. LUG.TOKNT.TO vs. IMG.TOKNT.TO vs. CLS.TOKNT.TO vs. RUS.TOKNT.TO vs. ^TNXKNT.TO vs. WTE.TO
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KNT.TO
KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KNT.TOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.16
2.53

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.64
3.49

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.56

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

15.50

-11.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNT.TO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KNT.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.53

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.05

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.95

-0.52

Drawdowns

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.00%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KNT.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.00%

-29.74%

-52.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.35%

-8.25%

-30.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.35%

-15.08%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.53%

-19.56%

-34.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.47%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.21%

-0.56%

-28.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-4.11%

-32.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.87%

1.89%

+11.98%

Volatility

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.27% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that KNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KNT.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.27%

3.70%

+14.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.44%

9.38%

+29.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.52%

11.63%

+37.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.02%

13.12%

+35.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.33%

15.56%

+42.77%

Dividends

KNT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

KNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.48%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

KNT.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNT.TO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer