PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNT.TO vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KNT.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNT.TO achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -22.34% return.


KNT.TO

1D
0.44%
1M
-11.77%
6M
-24.32%
YTD
-8.81%
1Y
43.28%
3Y*
49.60%
5Y*
19.39%
10Y*
26.77%
ALL TIME*
17.03%

PLTR

1D
1.74%
1M
4.37%
6M
-20.38%
YTD
-22.34%
1Y
-10.35%
3Y*
105.94%
5Y*
45.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
57.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
-8.81%161.41%33.33%-15.12%6.68%-5.52%7.79%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-22.34%124.30%377.77%161.08%-62.51%-22.71%124.36%

Correlation

The correlation between KNT.TO and PLTR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.15

The correlation between KNT.TO and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KNT.TO:

CA$5.07B

PLTR:

$309.63B

EPS

KNT.TO:

$1.27

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

KNT.TO:

11.60

PLTR:

151.84

PEG Ratio

KNT.TO:

0.12

PLTR:

0.88

PS Ratio

KNT.TO:

5.34

PLTR:

66.31

PB Ratio

KNT.TO:

4.11

PLTR:

41.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$685.77M

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$495.11M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

KNT.TO:

$499.16M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNT.TO vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNT.TO
KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNT.TOPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.22

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

-0.41

+2.84

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNT.TO and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.67%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNT.TO and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNT.TOPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.67%

-83.57%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.50%

-47.41%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.50%

-47.41%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.53%

-77.89%

+23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.62%

-34.89%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.55%

-39.51%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.85%

25.08%

-7.23%

Volatility

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) is 13.41%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 15.27%. This indicates that KNT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNT.TOPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

15.27%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.20%

39.66%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.10%

51.31%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.25%

65.59%

-16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.06%

69.56%

-12.50%

Dividends

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNT.TO nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between K92 Mining Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
232.41M
1.63B
(KNT.TO) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KNT.TO vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between K92 Mining Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
73.5%
86.8%
Portfolio components
KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNT.TO and PLTR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNT.TO and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer