PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNOV vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNOV vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.


KNOV

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.75%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNOV vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KNOV and SMAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.68

The correlation between KNOV and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNOV vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNOV
KNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
KNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNOV vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNOVSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.75

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

4.81

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

26.11

-10.29

KNOV vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNOV and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNOVSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

3.46

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

2.01

-0.89

Drawdowns

KNOV vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNOV and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNOVSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-3.90%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.36%

-1.91%

-3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.09%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-0.40%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.35%

+1.19%

Volatility

KNOV vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that KNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNOVSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

0.38%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

2.10%

+4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

2.67%

+8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

3.67%

+9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

3.67%

+9.19%

KNOV vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNOV vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

KNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KNOV and SMAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNOV has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNOV dropped -15.03% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, KNOV leads with 24.28% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNOV has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KNOV.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for KNOV.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KNOV and 0.50% for SMAX.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNOV and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer