KNOV vs. JANB
KNOV (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
KNOV vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.08% return.
KNOV
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNOV vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November | 8.98% | 0.90% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNOV and JANB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNOV vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
KNOV
JANB
KNOV vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNOV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNOV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.97 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
KNOV vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNOV and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNOV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -6.52% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.22% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -1.14% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | — | — |
Volatility
KNOV vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNOV | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 7.41% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 7.41% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 7.41% | +5.45% |
KNOV vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNOV vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither KNOV nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KNOV and JANB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KNOV.
KNOV and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KNOV and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for KNOV and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer