KNOV vs. FMAR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR).

KNOV and FMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNOV is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Oct 31, 2024. FMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.

Performance

KNOV vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KNOV vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November	1.21%	11.91%	1.18%
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	2.73%	9.69%	2.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNOV achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 2.73% return.

KNOV

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -2.52%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAR

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 15.24%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNOV vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

FMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

KNOV

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November

Return for Risk

KNOV vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNOV

KNOV Risk / Return Rank: 70
KNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
KNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
KNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 79
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNOV vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KNOV	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.39	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.03	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.43	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.87	+0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	11.91	-2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNOV vs. FMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNOV and FMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNOV	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.39	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.99	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between KNOV and FMAR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KNOV vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNOV nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KNOV vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FMAR drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNOV and FMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNOV	FMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-14.36%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-8.31%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	0.00%	-3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-2.21%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.30%	+0.73%

Volatility

KNOV vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) at 2.94%. This indicates that KNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNOV	FMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	2.94%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	3.79%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	11.05%	+3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	10.49%	+2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	10.47%	+2.85%