PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNO vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNO vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNO achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 29.16% return.


KNO

1D
0.89%
1M
-3.74%
6M
13.93%
YTD
20.49%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.32%

VOLT

1D
-1.37%
1M
-7.39%
6M
18.49%
YTD
29.16%
1Y
37.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.02K$27.63K$35.86K
$11.88M$11.60M$15.83M

KNO vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
20.49%19.84%-3.00%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
29.16%25.92%-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between KNO and VOLT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.65

The correlation between KNO and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNO vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNO
VOLT

Technology

38.5%
14.1%

Industrials

22.9%
50.4%

Healthcare

13.6%

-

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
2.6%

Energy

4.2%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Financial Services

1.8%
0.5%

Utilities

1.5%
28.2%

Communication Services

1.2%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Technology

KNO
38.5%
VOLT
14.1%

Industrials

KNO
22.9%
VOLT
50.4%

Healthcare

KNO
13.6%
VOLT

-

Basic Materials

KNO
6.5%
VOLT
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KNO
5.8%
VOLT
2.6%

Energy

KNO
4.2%
VOLT
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

KNO
3.3%
VOLT

-

Financial Services

KNO
1.8%
VOLT
0.5%

Utilities

KNO
1.5%
VOLT
28.2%

Communication Services

KNO
1.2%
VOLT

-

Real Estate

KNO
0.8%
VOLT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNO vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNO
KNO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
KNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
KNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNO vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNOVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.35

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

9.03

-1.15

KNO vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNO and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNO vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNO drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNO and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNOVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.50%

-23.40%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-11.15%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-11.15%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-5.25%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

4.14%

-0.98%

Volatility

KNO vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) is 4.39%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that KNO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNOVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

8.89%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

20.02%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

23.41%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

24.96%

-7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

24.96%

-7.69%

KNO vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNO vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

KNO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than VOLT's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
0.90%1.08%3.13%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.35%0.46%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNO and VOLT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOLT has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to KNO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNO dropped -15.50% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 37.24% vs 24.74% for KNO. On fees, VOLT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNO has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 37.24% return vs 24.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOLT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for KNO.

KNO has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for KNO and 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNO and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer