KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO
KNGX.TO (Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF) and RID.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD) are both International Equity funds. KNGX.TO is passively managed, while RID.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, KNGX.TO returned 34.42% vs 32.72% for RID.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNGX.TO achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly lower than RID.TO's 16.07% return.
KNGX.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RID.TO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 32.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 12.80% | 35.23% | -5.77% |
RID.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD | 16.07% | 33.82% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGX.TO and RID.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.35 |
The correlation between KNGX.TO and RID.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGX.TO
RID.TO
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD (RID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNGX.TO | RID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | 3.34 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.06 | 13.44 | +2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGX.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum RID.TO drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGX.TO and RID.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGX.TO | RID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -28.74% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -9.85% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -2.31% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -4.45% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.44% | -0.29% |
Volatility
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) is 2.88%, while RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD (RID.TO) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that KNGX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RID.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNGX.TO | RID.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.23% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 12.09% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 14.95% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.98% | -0.01% |
Dividends
KNGX.TO vs. RID.TO - Dividend Comparison
KNGX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than RID.TO's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 2.24% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RID.TO RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD | 2.84% | 3.03% | 3.52% | 3.76% | 4.09% | 2.65% | 3.54% | 4.14% | 4.57% | 3.00% | 3.35% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNGX.TO and RID.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and RBC.
Find the right allocation for KNGX.TO and RID.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer