KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO).
KNGX.TO and FCIM.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNGX.TO is a passively managed fund by Brompton that tracks the performance of the Brompton Index One International Cash Flow Kings Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2024. FCIM.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. Both KNGX.TO and FCIM.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 10.43% | 35.23% | -3.95% |
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF | 7.74% | 37.03% | 3.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNGX.TO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than FCIM.NEO's 7.74% return.
KNGX.TO
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 22.26%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCIM.NEO
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNGX.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FCIM.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
KNGX.TO
FCIM.NEO
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNGX.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.79 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.54 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.47 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 9.60 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNGX.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.79 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | -0.10 | +1.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGX.TO and FCIM.NEO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
KNGX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, which matches FCIM.NEO's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 1.48% | 2.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF | 1.48% | 1.59% | 1.26% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 2.70% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGX.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum FCIM.NEO drawdown of -67.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGX.TO and FCIM.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGX.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -67.91% | +54.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -13.21% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -18.52% | +16.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -52.34% | +50.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.40% | -0.85% |
Volatility
KNGX.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) is 5.01%, while Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that KNGX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNGX.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 8.40% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 12.15% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 18.06% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 16.61% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 32.29% | -17.12% |