PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGLX vs. TCBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGLX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than TCBIX's 10.92% return.


KNGLX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.12%
6M
3.75%
YTD
9.30%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.65%

TCBIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.59%
6M
7.01%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
7.57%
ALL TIME*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
9.30%6.43%2.91%6.46%-7.29%23.23%7.08%26.58%-4.64%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
10.92%12.61%4.09%4.09%0.05%18.21%-1.71%18.73%-3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGLX and TCBIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.83

The correlation between KNGLX and TCBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGLX vs. TCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNGLX
KNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
KNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TCBIX
TCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) and The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGLXTCBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.53

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

11.58

-7.68

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the TCBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGLX and TCBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, which is greater than TCBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGLX and TCBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGLXTCBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-28.94%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-5.26%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.79%

-12.73%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-17.07%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-0.31%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-3.45%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

1.60%

+1.79%

Volatility

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Volatility Comparison

CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to The Covered Bridge Fund (TCBIX) at 2.90%. This indicates that KNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGLXTCBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

2.90%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

6.45%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

8.77%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

12.20%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

13.51%

+3.59%

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGLX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TCBIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGLX vs. TCBIX - Dividend Comparison

KNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, more than TCBIX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
12.27%8.02%9.60%7.99%4.54%4.41%3.53%4.53%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCBIX
The Covered Bridge Fund
8.34%8.24%7.47%7.34%8.09%6.00%4.70%6.77%11.55%7.32%7.32%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGLX and TCBIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNGLX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to TCBIX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGLX dropped -31.48% vs TCBIX's -28.94%.

TCBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGLX and TCBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer