KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

KNGG.TO (Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF) and CAGE.TO (Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At 0.41, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KNGG.TO

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAGE.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KNGG.TO Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF	0.44%
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGG.TO and CAGE.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGG.TO) and Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNGG.TO	CAGE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	7.84	-6.21

Drawdowns

KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.56%, smaller than the maximum CAGE.TO drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGG.TO and CAGE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNGG.TO	CAGE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-2.93%	+1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-0.54%	+0.10%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KNGG.TO	CAGE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.85%	17.37%	-7.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	17.37%	-7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.85%	17.37%	-7.52%

Dividends

KNGG.TO vs. CAGE.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KNGG.TO nor CAGE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments