PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has outperformed XT with an annualized return of 21.42%, while XT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.70% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
-0.63%
1M
26.38%
YTD
63.41%
6M
62.53%
1Y
99.38%
3Y*
43.36%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
21.42%

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
63.41%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and XT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.81

The correlation between KNCT and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
XT

Technology

80.8%
43.5%

Communication Services

14.0%
5.2%

Real Estate

4.1%
0.0%

Industrials

1.1%
10.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

23.4%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

KNCT
80.8%
XT
43.5%

Communication Services

KNCT
14.0%
XT
5.2%

Real Estate

KNCT
4.1%
XT
0.0%

Industrials

KNCT
1.1%
XT
10.1%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
XT
3.3%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

XT
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

KNCT

-

XT
0.3%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

XT
23.4%

Utilities

KNCT

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNCTXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.48

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.00

4.41

+5.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.01

18.51

+25.50

KNCT vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNCTXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

2.89

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.41

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.73

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.66

-0.08

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-34.41%

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-10.45%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-22.09%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-34.41%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-34.41%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.47%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-7.41%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.49%

-0.22%

Volatility

KNCT vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

4.85%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

11.94%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

15.99%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

20.76%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

20.08%

+2.89%

KNCT vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and XT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.42% vs 14.70% for XT. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.

KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.46% for XT.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer