PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 21.42%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
-0.63%
1M
26.38%
YTD
63.41%
6M
62.53%
1Y
99.38%
3Y*
43.36%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
21.42%

IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
63.41%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and IGM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.82

The correlation between KNCT and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
IGM

Technology

80.8%
82.8%

Communication Services

14.0%
16.8%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Industrials

1.1%
0.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

KNCT
80.8%
IGM
82.8%

Communication Services

KNCT
14.0%
IGM
16.8%

Real Estate

KNCT
4.1%
IGM

-

Industrials

KNCT
1.1%
IGM
0.2%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
IGM
0.2%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

IGM

-

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

IGM
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

IGM

-

Energy

KNCT

-

IGM
0.1%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

IGM

-

Utilities

KNCT

-

IGM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNCTIGMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.70

3.07

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.72

3.78

+1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.50

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.00

3.81

+6.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

44.01

13.36

+30.66

KNCT vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNCTIGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70

3.07

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.03

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-65.59%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-16.44%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-26.39%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-40.68%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-40.68%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.84%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-15.23%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

4.67%

-2.40%

Volatility

KNCT vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

6.10%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

16.08%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

20.43%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.19%

25.68%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

24.54%

-1.57%

KNCT vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than IGM's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.57%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and IGM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 21.42% for KNCT. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 21.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.

KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.46% for IGM.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer