KNCT vs. CHPS
KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KNCT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KNCT returned 99.38% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KNCT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
KNCT vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
KNCT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 10.32% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNCT and CHPS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between KNCT and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
KNCT vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KNCT
CHPS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
KNCT
CHPS
Communication Services
KNCT
CHPS
-
Real Estate
KNCT
CHPS
-
Industrials
KNCT
CHPS
Financial Services
KNCT
CHPS
Basic Materials
KNCT
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
KNCT
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
KNCT
-
CHPS
-
Energy
KNCT
-
CHPS
Healthcare
KNCT
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
KNCT
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNCT vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
KNCT
CHPS
KNCT vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNCT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.70 | 6.54 | -1.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.72 | 6.07 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.81 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.00 | 12.87 | -2.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.01 | 49.99 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNCT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 6.54 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.81 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
KNCT vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNCT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -39.44% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.99% | -17.50% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -9.16% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 4.50% | -2.23% |
Volatility
KNCT vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) is 9.19%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that KNCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNCT | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 14.18% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 28.19% | -11.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.28% | 34.43% | -13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 33.78% | -10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 33.78% | -10.81% |
KNCT vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNCT vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNCT and CHPS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to KNCT (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 99.38% for KNCT. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, KNCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 99.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.
KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.
KNCT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 4.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNCT and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer