KNBWY vs. BEP
KNBWY (Kirin Holdings Co Ltd) and BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) are both stocks. KNBWY operates in Beverages - Brewers (Consumer Defensive), while BEP operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, KNBWY returned 1.55%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for BEP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNBWY vs. BEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNBWY achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than BEP's 35.56% return. Over the past 10 years, KNBWY has underperformed BEP with an annualized return of 1.55%, while BEP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.
KNBWY
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
BEP
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 35.56%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 50.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
KNBWY vs. BEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNBWY Kirin Holdings Co Ltd | 15.84% | 18.13% | -9.53% | -4.01% | -5.82% | -32.10% | 9.07% | 5.00% | -17.74% | 55.06% |
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 35.56% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 90.75% | -20.95% | 24.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNBWY and BEP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
KNBWY:
$14.12B
BEP:
$10.84B
KNBWY:
¥188.24
BEP:
$0.66
KNBWY:
14.97
BEP:
54.06
KNBWY:
0.29
BEP:
0.39
KNBWY:
0.92
BEP:
1.63
KNBWY:
1.72
BEP:
2.93
KNBWY:
¥2.49T
BEP:
$6.37B
KNBWY:
¥1.20T
BEP:
$2.19B
KNBWY:
¥354.30B
BEP:
$4.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNBWY vs. BEP — Risk / Return Rank
KNBWY
BEP
KNBWY vs. BEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kirin Holdings Co Ltd (KNBWY) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNBWY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.55 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 8.07 | -3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNBWY vs. BEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNBWY drawdown since its inception was -58.07%, which is greater than BEP's maximum drawdown of -53.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNBWY and BEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNBWY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.07% | -53.85% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -14.25% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.79% | -31.78% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.49% | -47.46% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.07% | -53.85% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.41% | -5.47% | -33.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.44% | -13.61% | -14.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 6.26% | -0.49% |
Volatility
KNBWY vs. BEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kirin Holdings Co Ltd (KNBWY) is 6.90%, while Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that KNBWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNBWY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 7.82% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 19.61% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.08% | 28.85% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 31.01% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 30.02% | -6.05% |
Dividends
KNBWY vs. BEP - Dividend Comparison
KNBWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than BEP's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.28% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
KNBWY Kirin Holdings Co Ltd | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.24% | 2.41% |
Financials
KNBWY vs. BEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kirin Holdings Co Ltd and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KNBWY vs. BEP - Profitability Comparison
KNBWY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirin Holdings Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 281.99B and revenue of 583.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
BEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 210.05M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.
KNBWY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirin Holdings Co Ltd reported an operating income of 50.91B and revenue of 583.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
BEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 138.06M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
KNBWY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kirin Holdings Co Ltd reported a net income of 27.58B and revenue of 583.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
BEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a net income of -113.41M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KNBWY and BEP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEP has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to KNBWY (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNBWY dropped -58.07% vs BEP's -53.85%.
BEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNBWY and BEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer