KMLM vs. PCY
KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) and PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index, while PCY is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KMLM returned 4.34%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for PCY. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. KMLM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PCY.
Performance
KMLM vs. PCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than PCY's 2.69% return.
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
PCY
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
KMLM vs. PCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 6.97% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 2.69% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMLM and PCY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.32 |
The correlation between KMLM and PCY shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (5 years) to -0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMLM vs. PCY — Risk / Return Rank
KMLM
PCY
KMLM vs. PCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMLM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.39 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 9.67 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMLM vs. PCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, smaller than the maximum PCY drawdown of -49.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and PCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMLM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -49.13% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -5.91% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -11.52% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -37.17% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.59% | -0.67% | -15.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -6.95% | -5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.46% | +0.91% |
Volatility
KMLM vs. PCY - Volatility Comparison
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) at 2.20%. This indicates that KMLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMLM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.20% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 5.98% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 7.52% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 13.18% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 12.95% | +1.74% |
KMLM vs. PCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PCY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMLM vs. PCY - Dividend Comparison
KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than PCY's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.70% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.84% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMLM and PCY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMLM has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to PCY (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLM dropped -27.47% vs PCY's -49.13%.
On 5-year performance, KMLM leads with 4.34% vs 1.42% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PCY has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KMLM has performed better with a 4.34% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
PCY has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 4.70% for KMLM.
KMLM is categorized as Systematic Trend, while PCY is Emerging Markets Bonds. KMLM tracks KFA MLM Index, while PCY tracks DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for KMLM and 0.50% for PCY.
PCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMLM and PCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer