PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLM vs. MARB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KMLM vs. MARB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KMLM vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.29%7.02%0.73%2.16%3.89%0.26%-0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLM achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than MARB's 0.29% return.


KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*

MARB

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.29%
6M
2.63%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KMLM vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KMLM vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MARB
MARB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLM vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMLMMARBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.29

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

2.00

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.13

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.31

21.28

-17.97

KMLM vs. MARB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the MARB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLM and MARB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLMMARBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.29

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.65

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.34

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between KMLM and MARB is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

KMLM vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison

KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than MARB's 3.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
3.01%3.01%2.11%2.20%0.99%0.00%

Drawdowns

KMLM vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLM drawdown since its inception was -27.47%, which is greater than MARB's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLM and MARB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLMMARBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-11.99%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-2.43%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-3.67%

-23.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.27%

-0.24%

-15.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-1.44%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.36%

+2.05%

Volatility

KMLM vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison

KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 1.15%. This indicates that KMLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KMLMMARBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

1.15%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

3.17%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

5.36%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

4.23%

+10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

5.64%

+9.03%