KMKAX vs. LSHAX
KMKAX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund) and LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds from Kinetics. Over the past 10 years, KMKAX returned 19.67%/yr vs 17.68%/yr for LSHAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KMKAX charges 1.65%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for LSHAX.
Performance
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMKAX achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 37.54% return. Over the past 10 years, KMKAX has outperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 19.67%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.68% annualized return.
KMKAX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 19.67%
LSHAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- YTD
- 37.54%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- 30.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.68%
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 16.00% | -3.31% | 83.58% | -7.57% | 14.69% | 27.69% | 19.31% | 22.42% | -10.92% | 46.89% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 37.54% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMKAX and LSHAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between KMKAX and LSHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMKAX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
KMKAX
LSHAX
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 0.81 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 1.84 | -0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMKAX drawdown since its inception was -65.57%, smaller than the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMKAX and LSHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -69.03% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.20% | -28.39% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.45% | -45.79% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -45.79% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -50.78% | +19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.15% | -22.65% | +7.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.52% | -21.96% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.67% | 12.52% | -3.85% |
Volatility
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) is 6.58%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that KMKAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 10.55% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | 30.23% | -10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 39.05% | -14.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 34.59% | -8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.75% | 30.92% | -7.17% |
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMKAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
KMKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than LSHAX's 8.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 0.52% | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 0.02% | 0.07% | 9.28% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 8.43% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, KMKAX and LSHAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LSHAX has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to KMKAX (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMKAX dropped -65.57% vs LSHAX's -69.03%.
LSHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMKAX and LSHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer