KMKAX vs. LSHAX
KMKAX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund) and LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds from Kinetics. Over the past 10 years, KMKAX returned 18.98%/yr vs 17.24%/yr for LSHAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KMKAX charges 1.65%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for LSHAX.
Performance
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMKAX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, KMKAX has outperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 18.98%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.24% annualized return.
KMKAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 31.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 18.98%
LSHAX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 26.51%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 7.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.24%
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 7.33% | -3.31% | 83.58% | -7.57% | 14.69% | 27.69% | 19.31% | 22.42% | -10.92% | 46.89% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 26.51% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMKAX and LSHAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between KMKAX and LSHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMKAX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
KMKAX
LSHAX
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.06 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 0.20 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 0.43 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMKAX drawdown since its inception was -65.57%, smaller than the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMKAX and LSHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -69.03% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.20% | -28.39% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.45% | -45.79% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -45.79% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -50.78% | +19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.49% | -28.86% | +7.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.52% | -21.96% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.08% | 13.54% | -5.46% |
Volatility
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) is 7.06%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that KMKAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMKAX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 11.92% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 30.13% | -10.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.79% | 38.34% | -14.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 34.43% | -7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 30.81% | -7.12% |
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMKAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KMKAX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
KMKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than LSHAX's 9.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 0.57% | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 0.02% | 0.07% | 9.28% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 9.16% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, KMKAX and LSHAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LSHAX has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to KMKAX (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMKAX dropped -65.57% vs LSHAX's -69.03%.
LSHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMKAX and LSHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer