KMID vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KMID returned 1.54% vs 1.59% for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. KMID charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

KMID vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMID achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.64% return.

KMID

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 1.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 1.59%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMID vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	1.08%	0.31%	-3.02%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.64%	2.55%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between KMID and CAOS is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	-0.28

Return for Risk

KMID vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 10
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 36
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMID vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KMID	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	1.06	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	1.69	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.22	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	2.10	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.36	5.06	-4.70

KMID vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMID and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KMID vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMID drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMID and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KMID	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-3.89%	-15.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-0.76%	-9.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.01%	-1.25%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-0.92%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	0.31%	+4.02%

Volatility

KMID vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.30%. This indicates that KMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KMID	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	0.30%	+4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	1.04%	+10.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	1.50%	+13.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	4.24%	+12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	4.24%	+12.75%

KMID vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMID has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

KMID vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.12%	0.06%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KMID and CAOS in my portfolio?

KMID and CAOS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KMID or CAOS?

KMID has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to CAOS (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMID dropped -18.89% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

Which ETF is better, KMID or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, CAOS leads with 1.59% vs 1.54% for KMID. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KMID or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, CAOS has performed better with a 1.59% return vs 1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KMID or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KMID or CAOS?

KMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between KMID and CAOS?

KMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for KMID and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.