PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMDIX vs. NQVRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMDIX achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly lower than NQVRX's 17.78% return. Over the past 10 years, KMDIX has underperformed NQVRX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while NQVRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.


KMDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.06%
6M
9.33%
YTD
15.03%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.24%
ALL TIME*
12.30%

NQVRX

1D
0.83%
1M
1.17%
6M
12.25%
YTD
17.78%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
13.49%
ALL TIME*
8.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMDIX
Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund
15.03%9.35%14.71%12.72%-5.27%24.84%-1.56%25.93%-12.60%15.98%
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
17.78%17.89%19.25%15.94%-1.02%28.56%-0.27%30.35%-14.39%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between KMDIX and NQVRX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.92

The correlation between KMDIX and NQVRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMDIX vs. NQVRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KMDIX
KMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
KMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NQVRX
NQVRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NQVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NQVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMDIXNQVRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

4.04

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

15.34

-9.18

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the NQVRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMDIX and NQVRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMDIX drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, which is greater than NQVRX's maximum drawdown of -67.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMDIX and NQVRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMDIXNQVRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.51%

-67.80%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-7.37%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

-17.93%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-17.93%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.51%

-42.26%

-31.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

0.00%

-6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.95%

-10.93%

-15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.94%

+0.99%

Volatility

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Volatility Comparison

Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX) have volatilities of 3.34% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMDIXNQVRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.32%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

10.11%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

13.27%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

16.17%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

18.97%

+33.55%

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMDIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NQVRX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMDIX vs. NQVRX - Dividend Comparison

KMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than NQVRX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMDIX
Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund
4.82%6.03%7.73%5.40%4.38%1.14%1.48%2.42%4.72%0.82%1.00%5.46%
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
1.59%1.87%1.86%1.29%1.42%1.23%3.40%1.34%0.00%1.99%1.02%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMDIX and NQVRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMDIX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to NQVRX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMDIX dropped -73.51% vs NQVRX's -67.80%.

NQVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMDIX and NQVRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer