PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMDIX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMDIX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, KMDIX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


KMDIX

1D
1.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
11.09%
6M
9.51%
1Y
17.82%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
9.97%

FSLSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.04%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMDIX
Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund
11.09%9.35%14.71%12.72%-5.27%24.84%-1.56%25.93%-12.60%15.98%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
21.04%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KMDIX and FSLSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.95

The correlation between KMDIX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMDIX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMDIX
KMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
KMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMDIXFSLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.32

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

10.82

-4.23

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMDIX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMDIXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.73

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.52

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.54

-0.26

Drawdowns

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMDIX drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, which is greater than FSLSX's maximum drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMDIX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMDIXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.51%

-69.87%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.79%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

-26.81%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-26.81%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.51%

-47.98%

-25.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.56%

0.00%

-9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-8.28%

-17.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.99%

-0.05%

Volatility

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund (KMDIX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMDIXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.27%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

14.50%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

18.78%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

20.50%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.56%

21.92%

+30.64%

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMDIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMDIX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

KMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
KMDIX
Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund
4.98%6.03%7.73%5.40%4.38%1.14%1.48%2.42%4.72%0.82%1.00%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMDIX and FSLSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMDIX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FSLSX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMDIX dropped -73.51% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FSLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMDIX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer