KLR.L vs. TW.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L).

Performance

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KLR.L Keller Group plc	19.21%	18.93%	70.44%	16.06%	-14.80%	46.98%	3.13%	60.22%	-47.46%	19.14%
TW.L Taylor Wimpey PLC	-17.62%	-3.91%	-11.37%	57.04%	-36.73%	11.45%	-4.62%	58.59%	-28.42%	44.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KLR.L : £1.42B TW.L : £3.16B
EPS KLR.L : £3.97 TW.L : £0.09
PE Ratio KLR.L : 5.01 TW.L : 9.86
PS Ratio KLR.L : 0.23 TW.L : 0.44
PB Ratio KLR.L : 2.21 TW.L : 0.75
Total Revenue (TTM) KLR.L : £6.07B TW.L : £7.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) KLR.L : £1.70B TW.L : £1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) KLR.L : £618.00M TW.L : £854.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLR.L achieves a 19.21% return, which is significantly higher than TW.L's -17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, KLR.L has outperformed TW.L with an annualized return of 13.86%, while TW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.33% annualized return.

KLR.L

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 19.21%
• 6M: 32.22%
• 1Y: 46.42%
• 3Y*: 48.94%
• 5Y*: 24.73%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

TW.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -19.64%
• YTD: -17.62%
• 6M: -11.36%
• 1Y: -14.43%
• 3Y*: -3.01%
• 5Y*: -7.19%
• 10Y*: 0.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KLR.L vs. TW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLR.L

KLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
KLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
KLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
KLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

TW.L

TW.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
TW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KLR.L	TW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	-0.49	+2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	-0.53	+2.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.94	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	-0.54	+2.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	-1.14	+6.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the TW.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLR.L and TW.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLR.L	TW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	-0.49	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	-0.25	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.01	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.04	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between KLR.L and TW.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Dividend Comparison

KLR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than TW.L's 5.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KLR.L Keller Group plc	2.59%	3.09%	3.30%	4.36%	4.56%	3.64%	9.07%	4.87%	7.40%	2.98%	3.26%	3.07%
TW.L Taylor Wimpey PLC	8.60%	8.68%	7.85%	6.51%	8.91%	4.72%	8.92%	9.48%	11.21%	6.68%	7.11%	4.67%

Drawdowns

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLR.L drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, smaller than the maximum TW.L drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLR.L and TW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLR.L	TW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	-98.99%	+22.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.48%	-27.22%	+8.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.69%	-52.79%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.83%	-56.37%	-1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.34%	-41.69%	+31.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.70%	-41.98%	+18.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.97%	12.82%	-4.85%

Volatility

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Volatility Comparison

Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) have volatilities of 9.08% and 9.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KLR.L	TW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.08%	9.14%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.50%	18.76%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	26.12%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.72%	28.45%	+3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.14%	34.58%	+2.56%

Financials

KLR.L vs. TW.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Keller Group plc and Taylor Wimpey PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KLR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

TW.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a gross profit of 375.90M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

KLR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 96.5%.

TW.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported an operating income of 250.70M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

KLR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a net income of 76.30M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

TW.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a net income of 162.20M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.