TW.L vs. PSMMY
TW.L (Taylor Wimpey PLC) and PSMMY (Persimmon Plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Residential Construction industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, TW.L returned 0.08%/yr vs 2.82%/yr for PSMMY. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TW.L is traded in GBp, while PSMMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSMMY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TW.L achieves a -22.81% return, which is significantly lower than PSMMY's -19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TW.L has underperformed PSMMY with an annualized return of 0.08%, while PSMMY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.
TW.L
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- -22.84%
- YTD
- -22.81%
- 1Y
- -21.42%
- 3Y*
- -4.73%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.08%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.87%
PSMMY
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -19.82%
- 1Y
- -8.93%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- -13.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TW.L Taylor Wimpey PLC | -22.81% | -3.91% | -11.37% | 57.04% | -36.73% | 11.45% | -14.27% | 58.59% | -28.42% | 36.12% |
PSMMY Persimmon Plc | -19.82% | 17.83% | -10.72% | 23.43% | -53.94% | 12.78% | 11.71% | 54.60% | -22.49% | 67.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TW.L and PSMMY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.69 |
The correlation between TW.L and PSMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
TW.L:
£2.79B
PSMMY:
$4.49B
TW.L:
£0.09
PSMMY:
£3.40
TW.L:
8.92
PSMMY:
6.12
TW.L:
0.39
PSMMY:
0.49
TW.L:
0.68
PSMMY:
0.94
TW.L:
£7.25B
PSMMY:
£6.94B
TW.L:
£1.31B
PSMMY:
£1.16B
TW.L:
£854.90M
PSMMY:
£833.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TW.L vs. PSMMY — Risk / Return Rank
TW.L
PSMMY
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) and Persimmon Plc (PSMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TW.L | PSMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.26 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.51 | -0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TW.L drawdown since its inception was -98.83%, which is greater than PSMMY's maximum drawdown of -64.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TW.L and PSMMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TW.L | PSMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.83% | -64.47% | -34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.20% | -34.13% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.62% | -38.02% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.58% | -61.68% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.78% | -64.47% | +3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.89% | -56.08% | +7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -23.45% | -20.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.65% | 17.61% | +0.04% |
Volatility
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) is 10.06%, while Persimmon Plc (PSMMY) has a volatility of 11.86%. This indicates that TW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TW.L | PSMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.06% | 11.86% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 27.43% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.14% | 33.29% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.82% | 34.58% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.46% | 36.10% | -3.64% |
Dividends
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Dividend Comparison
TW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than PSMMY's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMMY Persimmon Plc | 5.77% | 4.43% | 5.17% | 5.40% | 20.63% | 8.10% | 7.91% | 8.26% | 12.82% | 5.15% | 14.45% | 4.50% |
TW.L Taylor Wimpey PLC | 9.50% | 8.68% | 7.85% | 6.51% | 8.91% | 4.72% | 0.00% | 9.48% | 11.21% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Wimpey PLC and Persimmon Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TW.L vs. PSMMY - Profitability Comparison
TW.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a gross profit of 375.90M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.
PSMMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Persimmon Plc reported a gross profit of 312.36M and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
TW.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported an operating income of 250.70M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
PSMMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Persimmon Plc reported an operating income of 258.70M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
TW.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a net income of 162.20M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
PSMMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Persimmon Plc reported a net income of 184.56M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TW.L and PSMMY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TW.L and PSMMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer