PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TW.L vs. PSMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) and Persimmon Plc (PSMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TW.L is traded in GBp, while PSMMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSMMY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TW.L achieves a -25.71% return, which is significantly lower than PSMMY's -19.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TW.L has underperformed PSMMY with an annualized return of -1.11%, while PSMMY has yielded a comparatively higher 0.45% annualized return.


TW.L

1D
1.15%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-25.71%
6M
-21.67%
1Y
-26.79%
3Y*
-6.29%
5Y*
-7.91%
10Y*
-1.11%

PSMMY

1D
2.10%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-19.53%
6M
-19.26%
1Y
-11.95%
3Y*
-1.04%
5Y*
-14.71%
10Y*
0.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TW.L
Taylor Wimpey PLC
-25.71%-3.91%-11.37%57.04%-36.73%11.45%-4.62%58.59%-28.42%44.27%
PSMMY
Persimmon Plc
-19.53%17.83%-10.72%23.43%-53.94%12.78%11.71%54.60%-22.49%67.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TW.L and PSMMY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.69

The correlation between TW.L and PSMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TW.L:

£2.75B

PSMMY:

$4.72B

EPS

TW.L:

£0.09

PSMMY:

$3.41

PE Ratio

TW.L:

8.58

PSMMY:

8.54

PS Ratio

TW.L:

0.38

PSMMY:

0.68

PB Ratio

TW.L:

0.66

PSMMY:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

TW.L:

£7.25B

PSMMY:

$6.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TW.L:

£1.31B

PSMMY:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

TW.L:

£854.90M

PSMMY:

$833.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TW.L vs. PSMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TW.L
TW.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMMY
PSMMY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PSMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) and Persimmon Plc (PSMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TW.LPSMMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.95

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.41

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

-0.81

-0.73

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TW.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the PSMMY Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TW.L and PSMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TW.LPSMMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

-0.42

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.01

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.19

-0.16

Drawdowns

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TW.L drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, which is greater than PSMMY's maximum drawdown of -64.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TW.L and PSMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TW.LPSMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.99%

-64.47%

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.99%

-33.54%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.12%

-38.02%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.58%

-64.39%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.37%

-64.47%

+8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.51%

-55.92%

+8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.00%

-23.15%

-18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.37%

16.67%

+0.70%

Volatility

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taylor Wimpey PLC (TW.L) is 8.39%, while Persimmon Plc (PSMMY) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that TW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TW.LPSMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.39%

9.28%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.75%

24.95%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.22%

32.06%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

34.22%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.65%

37.68%

-3.03%

Dividends

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Dividend Comparison

TW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than PSMMY's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSMMY
Persimmon Plc
5.53%4.43%5.17%5.40%20.63%8.10%7.91%8.26%12.82%5.15%14.45%4.50%
TW.L
Taylor Wimpey PLC
9.87%8.68%7.85%6.51%8.91%4.72%8.92%9.48%11.21%6.68%7.11%4.67%

Financials

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Wimpey PLC and Persimmon Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
2.19B
2.23B
(TW.L) Total Revenue
(PSMMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TW.L values in GBp, PSMMY values in USD

TW.L vs. PSMMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taylor Wimpey PLC and Persimmon Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
17.2%
14.0%
Portfolio components
TW.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a gross profit of 375.90M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

PSMMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Persimmon Plc reported a gross profit of 312.36M and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

TW.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported an operating income of 250.70M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

PSMMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Persimmon Plc reported an operating income of 258.70M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

TW.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Wimpey PLC reported a net income of 162.20M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

PSMMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Persimmon Plc reported a net income of 184.56M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TW.L and PSMMY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TW.L and PSMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer