KLR.L vs. KIE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Kier Group plc (KIE.L).

Performance

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Kier Group plc (KIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KLR.L Keller Group plc	19.21%	18.93%	70.44%	16.06%	-14.80%	46.98%	3.13%	60.22%	-47.46%	19.14%
KIE.L Kier Group plc	-11.80%	55.40%	43.65%	80.78%	-46.09%	64.88%	-18.79%	-76.15%	-59.02%	-16.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KLR.L : £1.42B KIE.L : £900.09M
EPS KLR.L : £3.97 KIE.L : £0.22
PE Ratio KLR.L : 5.01 KIE.L : 8.72
PEG Ratio KLR.L : 0.14 KIE.L : 0.20
PS Ratio KLR.L : 0.23 KIE.L : 0.11
PB Ratio KLR.L : 2.21 KIE.L : 1.73
Total Revenue (TTM) KLR.L : £6.07B KIE.L : £8.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) KLR.L : £1.70B KIE.L : £662.30M
EBITDA (TTM) KLR.L : £618.00M KIE.L : £349.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLR.L achieves a 19.21% return, which is significantly higher than KIE.L's -11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, KLR.L has outperformed KIE.L with an annualized return of 13.86%, while KIE.L has yielded a comparatively lower -13.62% annualized return.

KLR.L

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 19.21%
• 6M: 32.22%
• 1Y: 46.42%
• 3Y*: 48.94%
• 5Y*: 24.73%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

KIE.L

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -16.68%
• YTD: -11.80%
• 6M: -11.53%
• 1Y: 60.15%
• 3Y*: 45.73%
• 5Y*: 22.35%
• 10Y*: -13.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KLR.L vs. KIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLR.L

KLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
KLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
KLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
KLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

KIE.L

KIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
KIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Kier Group plc (KIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KLR.L	KIE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.03	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.78	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	2.39	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	8.48	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the KIE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLR.L and KIE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLR.L	KIE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.03	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.67	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	-0.26	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.11	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between KLR.L and KIE.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Dividend Comparison

KLR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than KIE.L's 3.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KLR.L Keller Group plc	2.59%	3.09%	3.30%	4.36%	4.56%	3.64%	9.07%	4.87%	7.40%	2.98%	3.26%	3.07%
KIE.L Kier Group plc	3.68%	3.24%	3.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.10%	16.62%	6.20%	4.70%	3.97%

Drawdowns

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLR.L drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, smaller than the maximum KIE.L drawdown of -96.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLR.L and KIE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLR.L	KIE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	-96.62%	+19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.48%	-24.51%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.69%	-57.44%	+17.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.83%	-96.62%	+38.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.34%	-80.79%	+70.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.70%	-39.88%	+16.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.97%	6.92%	+1.05%

Volatility

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Volatility Comparison

Keller Group plc (KLR.L) and Kier Group plc (KIE.L) have volatilities of 9.08% and 9.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KLR.L	KIE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.08%	9.10%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.50%	17.85%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	29.46%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.72%	33.52%	-1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.14%	52.29%	-15.15%

Financials

KLR.L vs. KIE.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Keller Group plc and Kier Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KLR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

KIE.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kier Group plc reported a gross profit of 151.00M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.5%.

KLR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 96.5%.

KIE.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kier Group plc reported an operating income of 63.00M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

KLR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a net income of 76.30M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

KIE.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kier Group plc reported a net income of 24.70M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.