KLMN vs. SCHX
KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - KLMN tracks the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KLMN returned 27.74% vs 27.36% for SCHX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KLMN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
KLMN vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KLMN having a 10.80% return and SCHX slightly lower at 10.72%.
KLMN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
KLMN vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 10.80% | 18.24% | -3.62% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | -3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMN and SCHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between KLMN and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMN vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
KLMN
SCHX
KLMN vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLMN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.05 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.14 | 13.85 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLMN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.29 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.85 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
KLMN vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMN and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -34.33% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -9.02% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.70% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -3.97% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.98% | -0.01% |
Volatility
KLMN vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMN | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.91% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 9.02% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 11.99% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 17.12% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 18.15% | -0.54% |
KLMN vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KLMN vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 1.28% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, KLMN and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KLMN has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLMN dropped -19.16% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 1-year performance, KLMN leads with 27.74% vs 27.36% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KLMN has performed better with a 27.74% return vs 27.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for KLMN.
KLMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
KLMN tracks MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KLMN and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLMN and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer