PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMH.DE achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than XBAG.DE's 1.20% return.


KLMH.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
0.13%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
-2.83%
10Y*

XBAG.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.06%
6M
0.26%
YTD
1.20%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
1.36%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
-0.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLMH.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.21%1.14%1.55%7.19%-19.81%-3.83%4.75%7.54%-0.94%-0.44%
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
1.20%-3.91%3.40%1.86%-11.54%2.90%-0.49%9.26%3.05%-4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017

0.49

The correlation between KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMH.DE
KLMH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAG.DE
XBAG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLMH.DEXBAG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.10

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

0.84

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

1.73

-1.63

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the XBAG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, smaller than the maximum XBAG.DE drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMH.DEXBAG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-27.90%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.42%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.63%

-7.50%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

-15.82%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.51%

-11.61%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-10.63%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.18%

+0.10%

Volatility

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XBAG.DE) at 0.96%. This indicates that KLMH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMH.DEXBAG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

0.96%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

2.67%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08%

3.82%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

6.07%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

5.82%

-0.36%

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMH.DE vs. XBAG.DE - Dividend Comparison

KLMH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBAG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
KLMH.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBAG.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
2.98%2.94%3.16%2.22%2.78%0.82%1.47%1.76%1.36%1.11%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBAG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBAG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMH.DE.

KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while XBAG.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMH.DE and 0.10% for XBAG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMH.DE and XBAG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer