KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
KLMH.DE (Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMH.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KLMH.DE returned -2.43%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLMH.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMH.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 19.67% return.
KLMH.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 21.36%
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMH.DE Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 7.19% | -19.81% | -3.83% | 4.75% | 7.54% | -0.94% | -0.44% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 19.67% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 42.90% | 3.23% | 4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMH.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
KLMH.DE
6AQQ.DE
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLMH.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.35 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.36 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 9.73 | -8.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMH.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.67%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMH.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMH.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.67% | -31.19% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -10.01% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.80% | -26.73% | +22.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -31.19% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.52% | -2.06% | -12.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -5.35% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 3.46% | -2.23% |
Volatility
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) is 1.11%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that KLMH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMH.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 6.61% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.04% | 12.10% | -8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 16.70% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 19.97% | -13.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 19.69% | -14.23% |
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLMH.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither KLMH.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLMH.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMH.DE.
KLMH.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMH.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for KLMH.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer