PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KLMG.L is traded in GBP, while V3GD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the V3GD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMG.L achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than V3GD.L's 1.02% return.


KLMG.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.83%
6M
-1.34%
1Y
0.36%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-1.59%
10Y*

V3GD.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.65%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.11%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KLMG.L
Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
0.83%1.12%3.03%8.52%-18.95%0.35%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
1.02%-1.30%5.75%3.20%-2.95%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMG.L and V3GD.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.33

The correlation between KLMG.L and V3GD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMG.L
KLMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KLMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GD.L
V3GD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLMG.LV3GD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.15

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

1.04

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

2.55

-2.35

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMG.L and V3GD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLMG.LV3GD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.85

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.25

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

0.26

-0.57

Drawdowns

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, which is greater than V3GD.L's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMG.L and V3GD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMG.LV3GD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-13.73%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-5.30%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.94%

-8.65%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-13.73%

-9.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.23%

-2.60%

-8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-5.26%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.17%

-0.37%

Volatility

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) have volatilities of 1.72% and 1.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMG.LV3GD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

1.73%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.68%

5.11%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

6.47%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

8.63%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

8.62%

-3.04%

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMG.L vs. V3GD.L - Dividend Comparison

KLMG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KLMG.L
Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
0.00%0.00%2.02%1.44%1.28%1.03%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.45%4.35%4.05%2.44%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMG.L and V3GD.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMG.L.

KLMG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while V3GD.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMG.L and 0.15% for V3GD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMG.L and V3GD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer