KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L).
KLMG.L and CRHG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KLMG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Jul 23, 2020. CRHG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both KLMG.L and CRHG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMG.L Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist | -0.09% | 1.12% | 3.03% | 8.52% | -18.95% | -3.47% | 1.21% |
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | -0.20% | 5.84% | 3.84% | 7.67% | -15.04% | -1.45% | 2.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMG.L achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than CRHG.L's -0.20% return.
KLMG.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 1.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CRHG.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRHG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
KLMG.L
CRHG.L
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLMG.L | CRHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.97 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 1.33 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.68 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | 6.19 | -5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLMG.L | CRHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.97 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.07 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.31 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMG.L and CRHG.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Dividend Comparison
KLMG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLMG.L Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.02% | 1.44% | 1.28% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRHG.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.13% | 4.01% | 3.76% | 3.18% | 2.70% | 2.02% | 2.27% | 2.66% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.10%, which is greater than CRHG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMG.L and CRHG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMG.L | CRHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.10% | -20.54% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.94% | -2.71% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.06% | -20.54% | -2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -1.66% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -5.62% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 0.73% | +0.75% |
Volatility
KLMG.L vs. CRHG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) is 1.54%, while iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CRHG.L) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that KLMG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KLMG.L | CRHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.77% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 2.58% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 4.61% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 5.62% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 5.74% | -0.16% |