PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLMG.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than IHHG.L's 1.59% return.


KLMG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.93%
6M
0.23%
YTD
0.59%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-1.48%
10Y*

IHHG.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.23%
6M
1.12%
YTD
1.59%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KLMG.L
Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
0.59%3.46%2.97%8.51%-18.88%-3.55%2.20%
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.59%9.03%6.38%9.77%-10.41%3.44%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between KLMG.L and IHHG.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLMG.L
KLMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KLMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IHHG.L
IHHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLMG.LIHHG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.27

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

10.12

-8.13

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLMG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLMG.L and IHHG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLMG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IHHG.L drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMG.L and IHHG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLMG.LIHHG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.89%

-23.51%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.54%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-4.38%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.07%

-14.78%

-8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.20%

-0.23%

-8.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-2.98%

-8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.57%

+0.50%

Volatility

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (KLMG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L) at 0.79%. This indicates that KLMG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLMG.LIHHG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.79%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

2.83%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

3.75%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

6.70%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

8.01%

-2.47%

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLMG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IHHG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLMG.L vs. IHHG.L - Dividend Comparison

KLMG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IHHG.L's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.15%6.06%6.23%5.55%5.21%4.25%4.89%5.47%3.58%
KLMG.L
Lyxor Green Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist
2.22%2.23%2.02%1.44%1.28%1.03%0.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KLMG.L and IHHG.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KLMG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KLMG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IHHG.L.

KLMG.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while IHHG.L is Corporate Bonds. KLMG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while IHHG.L tracks iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for KLMG.L and 0.55% for IHHG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLMG.L and IHHG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer