PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLGAX vs. ACIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLGAX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than ACIHX's 7.24% return.


KLGAX

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.24%
YTD
4.46%
6M
3.72%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
13.65%

ACIHX

1D
-1.57%
1M
5.48%
YTD
7.24%
6M
6.26%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KLGAX
MainStay WMC Growth Fund
4.46%16.60%25.22%38.63%-7.47%
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
7.24%16.26%27.35%44.64%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KLGAX and ACIHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.98

The correlation between KLGAX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLGAX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLGAX
KLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
KLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
KLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIHX
ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLGAXACIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.58

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

5.29

-1.20

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLGAX and ACIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLGAXACIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.64

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.00

-0.54

Drawdowns

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLGAX drawdown since its inception was -55.04%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLGAX and ACIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLGAXACIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-24.00%

-31.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-16.40%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

-24.00%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.07%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-4.89%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

4.87%

-0.21%

Volatility

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay WMC Growth Fund (KLGAX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLGAXACIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.93%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

12.02%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

15.80%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

21.06%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

21.06%

+0.88%

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLGAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

KLGAX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

KLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than ACIHX's 14.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
14.87%15.95%5.65%4.61%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLGAX
MainStay WMC Growth Fund
3.23%3.38%3.96%0.00%0.00%26.57%3.69%3.43%11.10%3.85%8.73%7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, KLGAX and ACIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACIHX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to KLGAX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLGAX dropped -55.04% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.

ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLGAX and ACIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer