PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJUN vs. KFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KJUN vs. KFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUN achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than KFEB's 11.46% return.


KJUN

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
4.15%
6M
4.65%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KFEB

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.73%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.76%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUN vs. KFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KJUN and KFEB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025

0.91

The correlation between KJUN and KFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KJUN vs. KFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUN
KJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
KJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KFEB
KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUN vs. KFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KJUNKFEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

4.25

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.06

15.46

+6.59

KJUN vs. KFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the KFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUN and KFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KJUNKFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.25

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.18

-0.43

Drawdowns

KJUN vs. KFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUN drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, roughly equal to the maximum KFEB drawdown of -14.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUN and KFEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KJUNKFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-14.16%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-5.80%

+3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.57%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.33%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.59%

-0.93%

Volatility

KJUN vs. KFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) is 1.03%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) has a volatility of 2.41%. This indicates that KJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KJUNKFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

2.41%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

7.71%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.63%

10.99%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

13.27%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

13.27%

-3.40%

KJUN vs. KFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KJUN and KFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

KJUN vs. KFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUN nor KFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KJUN and KFEB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KFEB has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to KJUN (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUN dropped -14.44% vs KFEB's -14.16%.

On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 24.53% vs 14.49% for KJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KJUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KJUN and KFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

KJUN and KFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KJUN and KFEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer