PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJUL vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KJUL vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.


KJUL

1D
0.10%
1M
0.77%
YTD
6.91%
6M
6.11%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUL vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KJUL
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July
6.91%7.70%8.69%11.78%-8.44%2.51%10.84%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020

-0.04

The correlation between KJUL and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KJUL vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL
KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KJULYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

3.79

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.03

11.86

+10.17

KJUL vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KJULYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-49.56%

+32.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-8.30%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-23.05%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-27.32%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-19.88%

+15.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.65%

-1.77%

Volatility

KJUL vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 0.41%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KJULYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.22%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.62%

12.19%

-7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

16.96%

-9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

21.10%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.63%

18.96%

-7.33%

KJUL vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

KJUL vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUL nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KJUL and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to KJUL (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.50% vs 4.98% for KJUL. On fees, KJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.50% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

KJUL and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 1.00% for YCS.

KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KJUL and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer