KJUL vs. BOUT

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while BOUT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KJUL returned 5.50%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for BOUT. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BOUT.

Performance

KJUL vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 28.33% return.

KJUL

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: 3.70%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 1Y: 13.52%
• 3Y*: 8.65%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: —

BOUT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 19.25%
• YTD: 28.33%
• 1Y: 25.21%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUL vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.22%	7.70%	8.69%	11.78%	-8.44%	2.51%	10.84%
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	28.33%	-6.77%	18.82%	13.27%	-22.60%	22.69%	42.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and BOUT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020	0.68

The correlation between KJUL and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

KJUL vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KJUL	BOUT
Technology	19.1%	33.0%
Industrials	17.9%	3.2%
Healthcare	16.2%	6.5%
Financial Services	15.5%	18.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	10.8%
Real Estate	5.9%	3.9%
Energy	5.5%	4.0%
Basic Materials	4.6%	12.3%
Utilities	2.8%	7.0%
Communication Services	2.4%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	4.8%

Return for Risk

KJUL vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BOUT

BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 43
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KJUL	BOUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.13	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	1.62	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.20	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	2.15	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	6.20	+9.16

KJUL vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and BOUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUL	BOUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-36.98%	+20.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-11.76%	+8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	-25.31%	+10.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	-28.28%	+11.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-4.79%	+3.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-12.22%	+8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	4.08%	-3.20%

Volatility

KJUL vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 1.31%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KJUL	BOUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	6.60%	-5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.63%	17.73%	-13.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.28%	22.49%	-15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.29%	19.82%	-7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.57%	23.00%	-11.43%

KJUL vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJUL vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

KJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	0.27%	0.34%	0.60%	1.32%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUL and BOUT in my portfolio?

KJUL and BOUT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KJUL or BOUT?

BOUT has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to KJUL (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs BOUT's -36.98%.

Which ETF is better, KJUL or BOUT?

On 5-year performance, BOUT leads with 7.95% vs 5.50% for KJUL. On fees, KJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KJUL or BOUT?

Over the 5-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUL or BOUT?

KJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUL or BOUT?

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for KJUL.

What is the main difference between KJUL and BOUT?

KJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 0.80% for BOUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.