KJUL vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - KJUL tracks the iShares Russell 2000 ETF while BAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KJUL returned 4.93%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for BAPR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

KJUL vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJUL achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.81% return.

KJUL

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 7.06%
• 1Y: 18.66%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUL vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.53%	7.70%	8.69%	11.78%	-8.44%	2.51%	11.61%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.81%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	12.58%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and BAPR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020	0.75

The correlation between KJUL and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

KJUL vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KJUL	BAPR
Industrials	17.5%	8.1%
Technology	16.9%	36.2%
Healthcare	16.5%	8.4%
Financial Services	15.9%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.1%
Real Estate	6.2%	1.9%
Energy	6.2%	3.5%
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.8%
Utilities	2.9%	2.3%
Communication Services	2.5%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.9%

Return for Risk

KJUL vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 81
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KJUL	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	3.59	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	6.11	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.87	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.47	10.46	-4.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.24	57.55	-37.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KJUL vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KJUL	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	3.59	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.98	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.84	-0.27

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUL	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-23.91%	+7.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-1.93%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	-15.58%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	-15.58%	-1.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.23%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-2.59%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.35%	+0.57%

Volatility

KJUL vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 0.61%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KJUL	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	1.06%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.77%	4.53%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	5.64%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.31%	11.49%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.67%	13.12%	-1.45%

KJUL vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KJUL and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

KJUL vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUL nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUL and BAPR in my portfolio?

KJUL and BAPR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KJUL or BAPR?

BAPR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to KJUL (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

Which ETF is better, KJUL or BAPR?

On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 4.93% for KJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KJUL or BAPR?

Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUL or BAPR?

KJUL and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUL or BAPR?

KJUL and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJUL and BAPR?

KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.