KJUL vs. APRB
KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KJUL is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
KJUL vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KJUL having a 5.90% return and APRB slightly lower at 5.78%.
KJUL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.20%
APRB
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.58K | $46.66K | $43.31K | |
| $1.73M | $5.07M | $2.30M |
KJUL vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July | 5.90% | 1.94% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 5.78% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJUL and APRB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJUL vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
KJUL
APRB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KJUL vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KJUL | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KJUL vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJUL | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.69% | -4.59% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | 0.00% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -0.65% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
KJUL vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJUL | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.32% | 5.72% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.27% | 5.72% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 5.72% | +5.83% |
KJUL vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJUL vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither KJUL nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KJUL and APRB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJUL.
KJUL and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for KJUL and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer