KJD vs. KLXY
KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and KLXY (Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KLXY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. KJD is actively managed, while KLXY is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KLXY.
Performance
KJD vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KJD
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLXY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJD vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 1.96% | -27.86% |
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF | -0.86% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJD and KLXY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJD vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KJD | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KJD vs. KLXY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJD | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.63% | — | — |
Volatility
KJD vs. KLXY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJD | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.90% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.90% | — | — |
KJD vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJD vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison
KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.84% | 0.74% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KJD and KLXY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
KLXY has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.
KJD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KLXY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.69% for KLXY.
Find the right allocation for KJD and KLXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer