PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJAN vs. PSMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KJAN vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KJAN having a 8.07% return and PSMR slightly lower at 7.68%.


KJAN

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.57%
YTD
8.07%
6M
7.35%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*

PSMR

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.38%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJAN vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KJAN
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January
8.07%10.90%8.86%14.71%-7.69%5.95%
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
7.68%6.74%11.99%16.85%-4.11%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between KJAN and PSMR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.75

The correlation between KJAN and PSMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

KJAN vs. PSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KJAN
PSMR

Industrials

17.5%
8.7%

Technology

16.9%
33.1%

Healthcare

16.5%
9.8%

Financial Services

15.9%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

6.2%
2.0%

Energy

6.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.9%

Utilities

2.9%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.5%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.4%

Industrials

KJAN
17.5%
PSMR
8.7%

Technology

KJAN
16.9%
PSMR
33.1%

Healthcare

KJAN
16.5%
PSMR
9.8%

Financial Services

KJAN
15.9%
PSMR
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KJAN
8.4%
PSMR
10.1%

Real Estate

KJAN
6.2%
PSMR
2.0%

Energy

KJAN
6.2%
PSMR
3.5%

Basic Materials

KJAN
4.8%
PSMR
1.9%

Utilities

KJAN
2.9%
PSMR
2.5%

Communication Services

KJAN
2.5%
PSMR
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

KJAN
2.4%
PSMR
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KJAN vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJAN
KJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMR
PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJAN vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KJANPSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.96

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

15.03

-10.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

73.58

-59.28

KJAN vs. PSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the PSMR Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJAN and PSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KJANPSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

4.23

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.01

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.05

-0.51

Drawdowns

KJAN vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJAN drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than PSMR's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJAN and PSMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KJANPSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-11.78%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-0.99%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-11.78%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

-11.78%

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.15%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-1.67%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.20%

+1.34%

Volatility

KJAN vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - January (KJAN) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) at 0.71%. This indicates that KJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KJANPSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

0.71%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

2.48%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

3.53%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

8.48%

+4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

8.41%

+7.01%

KJAN vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

KJAN vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJAN nor PSMR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KJAN and PSMR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KJAN has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJAN dropped -28.94% vs PSMR's -11.78%.

On 5-year performance, PSMR leads with 8.52% vs 7.61% for KJAN. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSMR has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJAN.

KJAN and PSMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJAN and 0.61% for PSMR.

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KJAN and PSMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer